Wednesday, June 19, 2013

The SIege of Stupidity


The Siege of Stupidity
The year 2035, a bill has been proposed in the United States which award $10 million every month to the school with the highest average GPA despite strikes against the act which most people believed the money could go to a better cause. For months they striked, signing online surveys that the money should go to funding entertainment or technology for new and improved smart phones, but it was all a waste of time.
Almost immediately new rules were enforced in schools requiring students to eat lunch as fast as their body will allow them. After finishing their meal, they were forced into libraries and computer labs where tutors and books waited eagerly for their arrival because the pay was big if they won the money. For an hour students would finish homework, attempt to understand complicated equations and theories, some even unsolved to that day. If any tutor deemed a student too stupid and thoroughly believed that they were bringing down the school average, they would be gone the next day and never seen again. Before being deemed an idiot, tutors would resort to verbal abuse, yelling at students for doing anything wrong. Maybe they were irritated that day, so the tutors can and will resort to physical punishments where most of them were shocked into ‘intelligence’ or whipped back into shape. This went on for weeks and weeks but none of the kids dare say a word of it in their home out of fear for their lives.
On the day that all of this mad studying began, students had microchips secretly implemented into their skull. An announcement was made shortly after the progress was complete they were told, “Any attempts to remove this will be dealt with accordingly. Oh and make sure not to tell anyone because if you do, we’ll take matters into our own hands, and I’m sure none of you would want that.” Most children were mortified, some grew violent and were quickly disposed of, and others were more rational, one of them being Garry Johnston. Garry was always the smart kid in school, very popular, and known as the shining example of a student in Whitney Young.
After school, Garry would gather up others who had similar goals and attempt to form a plan of rebellion. Communication was tough because of the chip in their heads, not even writing was safe because it kept track of any type of movement, whether it was writing, typing, or signing. The only way to communicate they could think of was drawing letters in the dirt with their feet, slow and almost useless they started using pebbles. They formed an absolutely huge collection of pebbles and compared to how fast they got work done before, this was a huge boost in efficiency.
After communication was finished, a plan was devised. Trying to fight the school off one by one would certainly result in death for all of them, or whatever happened to those deemed too stupid by the school. Running away wouldn’t work either due to the chips in their head. Soon it was realized, “What if everyone stopped working at once? They can’t possibly stop all of us!” Everyone liked the idea and refused to think into it any further unless they were discussing the plan with another fellow student. After months of planning, it was ready.
The following day during school, it was 11:55am. There were the occasional glances from other students, a lot of sweating and shaking out of fear if anything went wrong, but overall there was excitement. As soon as the clock struck 12:00, it began.
In a matter of seconds there was a full scale brawl inside the library. Students, teachers, and tutors fighting over weapons, some already lay dead on the floor and others shooting into the crowd without a care for who they hit. The fight didn’t last long, the students believed they won the fight, until they heard what sounded like a stampede outside. When they peered out the window, they found out exactly what happened to all the students deemed too stupid. They were all brainwashed and thirsty for blood. Needless to say the fight was lost, everyone was presumed dead and the school later closed down due to lack of funding.
Days passed and eventually the word spread of the horrible treatment going on in schools. Parents immediately removed their children from schools, no one knew who got the message out, and no one cared, they were all happy to be out of school and free to do as they pleased. Soon, on the FOX News station, a recording aired of spread the word of the cruel treatment, and in the chair was Garry. He shared all of the tragic events and treatment he and other students endured and the expressions on everyones’ face was that of pure awe. The reward for high GPAs was immediately removed, and of course, kids were forced back into school. It was a slow process but eventually parents trusted schools enough to teach their children.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

List of Advice For Incoming Freshmen

1: Study
Always study for test that you aren't completely sure that you'll ace, and even then study just to be safe.

2: Working
There's a library and a computer lab in this school, and of course you will have a mandatory lunch period. If you have the free time, feel free to stop off and finish your homework before you leave school for more free time and relaxation.

3: Procrastination
Always do your work on time, or get ready for a lot of stress.

4: Get Friends
Who else will help you with homework?

5: Be Prepared
Mentally and physically  for all assignments.

6: Jackets Are Nice
This school is cold almost every day of the year, bring something for warmth or freeze.

7: Don't Use the Vending Machines
Anything good was removed, there's only healthy snacks left.

8: Walking
Be prepared for other students to walk at extremely slow paces, block doorways and hallways to talk, and stink. Nose plugs and mental preparation is advised.

9: Music
Students seem to not know a majority of other people have ears, either bring ear plugs, tell them to turn it down, or listen to horrible rap/hip-hop

10: Twalking (Texting while walking)
A lot of people do this, they will crash into everything. Avoid them at all cost for safety reasons.

Monday, May 20, 2013

TED Talk: Steve Job's Speech

This may be a touching speech to others but it's definitely not touching, nor inspiring to me. Besides his story, almost everything in his speech has been said and done by many people who have achieved anything in life. No matter how hard their goal may have been, no matter how long it took them, they always say just work hard and everything will work out for you. But for a lot of people, this is not the case. Not everyone is as lucky as they have been, no matter how hard you work there will likely be an obstacle you can never overcome, or a crippling event will ruin your dreams. Even if you manage to overcome your inability, who's to say you'll ever reach your goal of becoming the best at it or anywhere near that for a matter. If you want to become successful, of course it will require hard work, and lots of it. But it will also require luck, and timing. If you come at a wrong time, if someone is in a bad mood, or anything at all goes wrong, your dreams can be crushed and there will be nothing you can do about it but try and try again until you either succeed, or run out of time. And most people run out of time.

TED Talk: Why We Do What We Do.

This speech hits home, as I expect it to happen to almost anyone that watches this video purely due to the topic. A lot of times in my life I would start some kind of personal project, or try to achieve a goal, but before I could do any of it I would just lose my motivation and quit. I've always wondered, "Why do I always lose motivation for this, even thought I love to do it?" This TED talk has helped make the answer a little bit clearer and I recommend others to watch it too.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Staying Underwater for 17 Minutes

This is easily, quite the feet from what you can imagine. A very large majority of people in this world can barely hold their breath for more than 2 minutes, at a time the world record for not breathing was a bit over 3 minutes. I know for a fact I won't be able to make it anywhere near 17 minutes, can't even hold mine for 20 seconds. So I must congratulate him on such a feet

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Speech


Victor Simmons
5/3/13
English II
Per.4

I would like to thank you all for choosing me, from such a large list of people, each with an amazing talent of their own, and I humbly accept this award for having such a short attention span. First of all, I would like to tell you all of my life as a child, during so is where my achievement of the shortest attention span in the world first began to take place. In class, in my mind, just about anywhere I went and anything I did would take so much longer than it needed to to be completed. One second I would be full on concentrating on my task at hand, then suddenly I’m discussing whether or not I should drink water or juice when I get home for the next half hour. This of course proved to be problematic for almost anything school wise, and even made some of everyday activities a task. Every time I wanted to get something, I would think of anything else, really, anything else except what I wanted to get! Eventually after turning around 6 times, I finally get what I’ve been trying to get in the first place. Even with these challenges, I tread on and still continued on my task of achieving the shortest attention span in the world. Eventually it began to impact my grades, it was a small change, but not very noticeable at first. Eventually it grew to become a problem so I knew I had to become more organized or my parents would force me to quit this “silly” task. So I knew I had to become more organized, thus began my cleaning phase. I cleaned my room, kept my agenda handy and started to write down assignments more and more and that fixed me forgetting my homework, but less so. Finally during the end of highschool I finally had everything set up the future looked bright and my goal for the shortest attention span in the world was practically in my grasp. Then came college and it sent me sprawling down a spiral. There was so much to do and I just couldn’t stay organized enough to remember my assignments. I was just about to fail almost all of my class due to forgotten homework. Eventually my dad chose to intervene after hearing of my problems and decided to tell me something that struck deep. “I’m disappointed in you.” Rather than sit there and more like most people would, I decided to work harder, try more tactics to successfully pass college while sticking to my goal. If it weren’t for my dad I would not be standing here today, accepting this award. He is by far the most caring and sympathetic man I know today. I could go on and on about the great and magnificent deeds he’s done in the past but I’m sure no one wants to hear about all of that. Now back to my short attention span, after college it bloomed into an entirely new level, one that was just out of this world and just couldn’t be compared to any other so-called short attention spans. I had finally achieved my goal and have managed to keep it short enough to be chosen as a recipient of this award. I can honestly say I’ve never been so proud of anything I’ve ever done in my life, I have never even thought I would get an award for doing all of this, I just wanted to break a record! I honestly can’t thank any of you enough for this and I will always remember this day, and everyone here.

Monday, April 22, 2013

Top 10 Poems

1. Birches by Robert Frost
2. A Dream Within A Dream by Edgar Allen Poe
3. A Road Not Taken by Robert Frost
4. Invictus by William Ernest Henley
5. If by Rudyard Kipling
6.Still I Rise by Maya Angelou
7. If You Forget Me by Pablo Neruda
8. I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou
9. Television by Roald Dahl
10. Dreams by Langston Hughes

Best Art Fair Piece

The best piece in the art fair that I've found had to be a painting of a forest. The painting takes place in a forest during the fall at what I believe to be sunset. The textures and the level of detail in this painting was simply amazing and it shows the amount of patience and effort that went into this painting.

Friday, April 12, 2013

"Robot" TED Talk

This robot looks different from most toy robots we see today, and without  a doubt, acts smarter too. Allowing you to take manual control and even interact with this robot does in fact sounds fun, but will it work? I am a little sketchy on how it won't just roll off tables and break anything, because one little robot is definitely not worth as much as an expensive vase.   As long as they can prove this robot won't be disastrous for any household, then I would consider buying it.

"Motorized Skateboard" TED Talk

This is definitely an interesting and unique concept brought into light, yet also very risky. While most people prefer bikes or just take trains and buses to get where they need, why use a skateboard? However this invention could also get a lot of money from people who currently skateboard, or be shunned because it doesn't follow the tradition of using your own legs to move the skateboard. Hopefully this invention succeeds because it certainly looks like it could go far.

Great Gatsby Questions

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1eg2Ob3uyLce3fpYO31VXNWsukebOvKCxfs9KAY06Pac/edit

Friday, April 5, 2013

"Mathemagician" TED Talk

I have never seen such a large memory, and calculation skills in a single person. This wasn't really much of a "talk" but more of a way for the presenter to show off his amazing skills at retaining vast numbers and calculation answers to equations such as 836 squared before you can enter it in a calculator, and correctly too. Not only could he solve mind-boggling equations in mere seconds, he could also get a specific day, if given the date. So lets say your birthday is November 27, he can find out the day just like that. Not to mention the few jokes he threw in here and there, this presentation was pretty well thought out. Other than errors it was pretty great.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

"Sophistry", "Winter Dreams", and "The Bear"

Sophistry:

"Sophistry" isn't the best story in my opinion. Similar to most love stories, two people realize they're in love, run to one another, happy ending. However the detail in this story was rather interesting from time to time.

Winter Dreams:

"Winter Dreams" altogether wasn't a very interesting story overall. It got you to dis-like the girl who took advantage of the main character, and lets you know how madly he fell in love with her. Then you can pity him after she so coldly breaks his heart. But once again, not very interesting in my opinion.

The Bear:

"The Bear" was definitely an interesting story. It gives you the feel of how the character feels each time the bear watches him from somewhere that he can't see. The story was long enough, yet short enough so that you don't get bored of the story. However there are a few repeating patterns that begin to get old.

TED Talk

In response to this video. Ted Talk: Still Figuring It Out

This video made valid and interesting points referring to how females are portrayed in comics or stories. No one should be restricted to socially "normal" behavior and change who they really are so they aren't shamed. However a lot of the major points in this video have already been discussed in many other videos and papers. 

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Final Draft Research Paper


Simmons-1

Ever since the first shooter games were released, they have used them as scapegoats to why anyone commit mass murder at any school. After such claims, research was funded to decide whether any of this was true or not, later these claims were proven false. But not only were they false, it was the complete opposite, violence was in fact at an all time low, going down by 40% since video games were first became popular. After the Sandy Hook shooting, these claims have risen once again.
These claims are made because everyone likes to point fingers or get rid of what they don’t like. So instead of find a what could’ve have really been the cause of the incidents, they just blame video games and move on. Video games are clearly not the cause of violence in children and there is no reason to try to ban video games for those under the age of 18.
It is unclear as of why people choose to blame video games for any violent acts carried out by others because they have nothing to gain by doing so. Christopher. J. Ferguson, believes  videogames should not be blamed for violence and makes this clear in his article, “Don’t Blame Videos Games For Real World-Violence” After the Virginia tech shooting, politicians and TV’s Dr.Phil stated videogames were one definite cause for this tragedy, “...TV’s Dr.Phil and politicians like Mitt Romney stated emphatically that video games were one cause of the tragedy. Later, in the official investigation, it emerged that the shooter did not play video games.” (Ferguson) Even after this, once the Sandy Hook shooting took place, scholars have still chosen to blame video game! “But even though we know little about Adam Lanza’s media use, and despite an absence of research linking video-game violence to societal violence or mass shootings, a number of scholars have drawn direct links between video games and the Sandy Hook event specifically.” (Ferguson) These claims are probably made because of their views and known information about video games, especially regarding what the media shows about videogames.
Simmons-2

Of course, there are people who disagree  that videogames are not scapegoats, but
really are the cause of violence in youth. Jack Thompson is no friend of gamers, oftenly referring to them as “knuckleheads” and even going so far to say that video games are “mental masturbation”. Alongside Jack Thompson is Dr.Phill McGraw who appeared on Larry King Live to discuss a recent tragedy, “The problem is we are programming these people as a society. You cannot tell me common sense tells you that if these kids are playing video games, where they’re on a mass killing spree in a video game, it’s glamorized on the big screen, it’s become part of the fiber of our society. You take that and mix it with a psychopath, a sociopath, or someone suffering from mental illness and add in a dose of rage, the suggestibility is too high. And we’re going to have to start dealing with that.” (Dr. Phill McGraw) Later, The Washington Post made an article addressing the shooting where scholars claimed the shooter had been a fan of video games, then later removed this when his suite-mate told the investigators that he never saw the shooter play video games on his computer. Even after everything Thompson said was shown to be wrong, he still said, “This is not rocket science. When a kid who has never killed anyone in his life goes on a rampage and looks like the Terminator, he’s a video gamer.” (Thompson) then sent a letter to Bill Gates stating, “Mr. Gates, your company is potentially legally liable for the harm done at Virginia Tech. Your game, a killing simulator, according to the news that used to be in the Post, trained him to enjoy killing and how to kill.” (Thompson) Thompson is clearly using videos games as a scapegoat, and still chooses to deny all evidence that goes against his belief.
In another article, Kevin Schut talks about videogames and that they don’t cause violence in children. Later in the article he clearly shows his opinion on the whole thing, “Of course, ending a digital life is not the same as ending a physical one...When gamers go violent in the
Simmons-3

physical world, there’s almost certainly something else going on there. Millions of gamers play violent games, and most do not engage in seriously violent actions. Destruction games are certainly arousing, but to be honest, even chess can have that effect. Competition of any kind can get out blood boiling.” (Schut) As previously stated, any competition of any type can anger you, it doesn’t have to be videogames and can be so much as a friendly game of tag. If anyone ever gets the urge to commit any violent act, they clearly have some type of mental problem.
John Hinderaker also realizes the problems of trying to ban videogames, not for the reason that most people believe, but for reasons of his own, “I think the world would be a better place, and a safer place, without violent video games. But I don’t want to ban them, not only because they are constitutionally protected-that could change- but because only a criminal is responsible for his crime. If we start regulating all the influences to which we think the demented may be subject, there will be no room left for freedom.” (Hinderaker) John makes a very good point here, even if his notion that videogames make the world more violent has been proven false by studies, it is true that not everything should be restricted just because a few mentally-ill people can or may not become violent because of it.
While most people steer to one side or the other on the videogame debate, Richard Rende is currently studying the effects of videogames on the behavior of children and teens and has decided there is no definite answer to this question, “This seemingly simple question does not have a simple answer.” (Rende) There can be many attributes to anyone’s behavior such as environmental effects, event effects, etc. So Rende is correct, there is no definite answer to the question of videogames causing violence.
Different studies done different ways have provided different information depending on how the data was gathered. Karen E. Dill and Craig A. Anderson conducted a study involving 210
Simmons-4

college students and allowed them to play videogames that came out recently. The students who played the violent games were found to punish their opponents for a longer amount of time than those who play non-violent games, “Despite the fact that this study was a short term effect, longer term effects are likely to be possible as the player learns and practices new aggression-related scripts that can become more and more accessible for the real-life conflict that may arise.” (Anderson) The process they used for this study could’ve been a bit more thorough or varying, and they should’ve done pre-test before asking certain questions to learn more about that person as who they are rather than the video game’s effect.
Moving back to the blame game, while everyone points fingers to what causes what, Jason Della Rocca looks at past events and the reactions of the people who experienced it. Apparently a lot of what we have now has been where videogames are now. Jazz, movies, paintings, comics, you name it. It’s all been
blamed and used as a scapegoat for what causes what, “People are essentially feeding off the fears of those who don’t understand games.” (Rocca) This shows that for whatever reason, someone blamed a problem on anything that would make sense at first, for their own personal gain, or maybe out of confusion and anger.
It’s quite clear that the blame game will linger on videogames for quite some time and until the next victim is chosen for this blame game, video games will be blamed for anything and everything that included any type of violence found in youth. So hopefully chooses to attempt to ban games for those under the age of 18 simply because a select few chose to carry out such violent, despicable, actions.


Simmons-Citations
Sources Used:

“Were video games to blame for for massacre” NBCNews. NBCNews.com, 20 April. 2007. Sat. 9 Mar. <http://goo.gl/Z75b6>o-games-violence-ge
“Don’t blame video games for real-word violence.” Chronicle. Chronicle.com, 10 Jan. 2013. Sun. 10 Mar. <http://goo.gl/YIGgl>
“Do video Games Cause Violence?” Relevant. relevantmagazine.com, 20 Feb. 2013. Mon. 11 Mar. <http://goo.gl/YdyMN>
“What about banning violent video games?” Neo-Neocon. neoneocon.com, 12 Jan. 2013. Mon. 11 Mar. 2013. <http://goo.gl/OwFpD>
“Does Playing Violent video Games Cause Violence?” Parents. Parents.com, 25 Jan. 2013. Mon. <http://goo.gl/0JGwD>
“Former FBI profiler: ‘Video games do not cause violence’” The Raw Story. rawstory.com Sun. 24 Feb. 2013. Tues. 12 Mar. <http://goo.gl/yhc82>
“Video Games: A cause of Violence and Aggression” Serendip. serendip.brynmawr.edu. Fri. 4 Jan. 2008. Tues. 12 Mar. 2013. <http://goo.gl/nQKSe>
“Video Games and Violence: Every Generation Blames Newest Media, Expert Says” abcNews. abcnews.go.com. 18 Dec. 2012. Tues. 12 Mar. <http://goo.gl/AsMnv>
“Video games cannot be solely blamed for violence” TheDN. dailynebraskan.com 17 Jan. 2013. Tues. 13 Mar. <http://goo.gl/H0KyO>
“Don’t blame the video games” CNNWorld. globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com. 12 Jan. 2013. Tues. 13 Mar. <http://goo.gl/Qnqhk>

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Research Project 2nd Draft


Simmons-1

Ever since the first shooter games were released, they have used them as scapegoats to why anyone commit mass murder at any school. After such claims, research was funded to decide whether any of this was true or not, later these claims were proven false. But not only were they false, it was the complete opposite, violence was in fact at an all time low, going down by 40% since video games were first became popular. After the Sandy Hook shooting, these claims have risen once again.
These claims are made because everyone likes to point fingers or get rid of what they don’t like. So instead of find a what could’ve have really been the cause of the incidents, they just blame video games and move on. Video games are clearly not the cause of violence in children and there is no reason to try to ban video games for those under the age of 18.
It is unclear as of why people choose to blame video games for any violent acts carried out by others because they have nothing to gain by doing so. Christopher. J. Ferguson, believes  videogames should not be blamed for violence and makes this clear in his article, “Don’t Blame Videos Games For Real World-Violence” After the Virginia tech shooting, politicians and TV’s Dr.Phil stated videogames were one definite cause for this tragedy, “...TV’s Dr.Phil and politicians like Mitt Romney stated emphatically that video games were one cause of the tragedy. Later, in the official investigation, it emerged that the shooter did not play video games.” (Ferguson) Even after this, once the Sandy Hook shooting took place, scholars have still chosen to blame video game! “But even though we know little about Adam Lanza’s media use, and despite an absence of research linking video-game violence to societal violence or mass shootings, a number of scholars have drawn direct links between video games and the Sandy Hook event specifically.” (Ferguson) These claims are probably made because of their views and known information about video games, especially regarding what the media shows about videogames.
Simmons-2

Of course, there are people who disagree  that videogames are not scapegoats, but
really are the cause of violence in youth. Jack Thompson is no friend of gamers, oftenly referring to them as “knuckleheads” and even going so far to say that video games are “mental masturbation”. Alongside Jack Thompson is Dr.Phill McGraw who appeared on Larry King Live to discuss a recent tragedy, “The problem is we are programming these people as a society. You cannot tell me common sense tells you that if these kids are playing video games, where they’re on a mass killing spree in a video game, it’s glamorized on the big screen, it’s become part of the fiber of our society. You take that and mix it with a psychopath, a sociopath, or someone suffering from mental illness and add in a dose of rage, the suggestibility is too high. And we’re going to have to start dealing with that.” (Dr. Phill McGraw) Later, The Washington Post made an article addressing the shooting where scholars claimed the shooter had been a fan of video games, then later removed this when his suite-mate told the investigators that he never saw the shooter play video games on his computer. Even after everything Thompson said was shown to be wrong, he still said, “This is not rocket science. When a kid who has never killed anyone in his life goes on a rampage and looks like the Terminator, he’s a video gamer.” (Thompson) then sent a letter to Bill Gates stating, “Mr. Gates, your company is potentially legally liable for the harm done at Virginia Tech. Your game, a killing simulator, according to the news that used to be in the Post, trained him to enjoy killing and how to kill.” (Thompson) Thompson is clearly using videos games as a scapegoat, and still chooses to deny all evidence that goes against his belief.
In another article, Kevin Schut talks about videogames and that they don’t cause violence in children. Later in the article he clearly shows his opinion on the whole thing, “Of course, ending a digital life is not the same as ending a physical one...When gamers go violent in the
Simmons-3

physical world, there’s almost certainly something else going on there. Millions of gamers play violent games, and most do not engage in seriously violent actions. Destruction games are certainly arousing, but to be honest, even chess can have that effect. Competition of any kind can get out blood boiling.” (Schut) As previously stated, any competition of any type can anger you, it doesn’t have to be videogames and can be so much as a friendly game of tag. If anyone ever gets the urge to commit any violent act, they clearly have some type of mental problem.
John Hinderaker also realizes the problems of trying to ban videogames, not for the reason that most people believe, but for reasons of his own, “I think the world would be a better place, and a safer place, without violent video games. But I don’t want to ban them, not only because they are constitutionally protected-that could change- but because only a criminal is responsible for his crime. If we start regulating all the influences to which we think the demented may be subject, there will be no room left for freedom.” (Hinderaker) John makes a very good point here, even if his notion that videogames make the world more violent has been proven false by studies, it is true that not everything should be restricted just because a few mentally-ill people can or may not become violent because of it.
While most people steer to one side or the other on the videogame debate, Richard Rende is currently studying the effects of videogames on the behavior of children and teens and has decided there is no definite answer to this question, “This seemingly simple question does not have a simple answer.” (Rende) There can be many attributes to anyone’s behavior such as environmental effects, event effects, etc. So Rende is correct, there is no definite answer to the question of videogames causing violence.










Sources Used:

“Were video games to blame for for massacre” NBCNews. NBCNews.com, 20 April. 2007. Sat. 9 Mar. <http://goo.gl/Z75b6>
“Don’t blame video games for real-word violence.” Chronicle. Chronicle.com, 10 Jan. 2013. Sun. 10 Mar. <http://goo.gl/YIGgl>
“Do video Games Cause Violence?” Relevant. relevantmagazine.com, 20 Feb. 2013. Mon. 11 Mar. <http://goo.gl/YdyMN>
“What about banning violent video games?” Neo-Neocon. neoneocon.com, 12 Jan. 2013. Mon. 11 Mar. 2013. <http://goo.gl/OwFpD>
“Does Playing Violent video Games Cause Violence?” Parents. Parents.com, 25 Jan. 2013. Mon. <http://goo.gl/0JGwD>

(Ending Paragraphs)
While everyone points fingers to what causes what, Jason Della Rocca looks at past events and the reactions of the people who experienced it. Apparently a lot of what we have now has been where videogames are now. Jazz, movies, paintings, comics, you name it. It’s all been
blamed and used as a scapegoat for what causes what, “People are essentially feeding off the fears of those who don’t understand games.” (Rocca) This shows that for whatever reason, someone blamed a problem on anything that would make sense at first, for their own personal gain, or maybe out of confusion and anger.
It’s quite clear that the blame game will linger on videogames for quite some time and until the next victim is chosen for this blame game, video games will be blamed for anything and everything that included any type of violence.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

There hasn't been much of a, wow factor in the technology coming this year. But I've decided to choose 3 inventions that stand out from the crowd and are definately worth a look.
_________________________________________________________________________________

3. Spheron's Robotic Balls

These little balls are definately quite the eye-catcher. They can be remotely controlled by bluetooth enabled phones. There is a lot of fun to be had with these, making small obstacle courses, messing with your family, or even playing with your pets.

2. Ford Sync Aplink

With this new invention, there might just be less of those people who just enjoy using their phone while driving. You can control your smartphone using just your voice without having to lay a finger on it. Sadly this isn’t out yet, and even worse, only for Ford drivers.

1. Solar Powered Phone Charger

Have you ever been stuck in a boring event but your phone isn’t doesn’t have enough battery life left to do anything to pass the time? Well that’s a thing of the past now. With this new invention, your phones can charge in any light. However you do need to buy phones that support this so that they’ll actually charge.